Optimal Poker Strategy


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 06.08.2020
Last modified:06.08.2020

Summary:

Optimal Poker Strategy

Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles. +. Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player. +. Short-Deck strategy is an extremely new game and the perfect strategy is still being developed. Just like Hold'em in the early s it's going to take some time​. Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player | Brokos, Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles.

Optimal Poker Strategy Wann genau macht GTO keinen Sinn?

Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player. +. Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles. +. Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player | Brokos, Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles. Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles. +. Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player. +. GTO ist die Abkürzung für Game Theory Optimal, doch warum sollte man vom vermeintlichen Optimum abweichen? Das erklärt FaLLout86 in. Heads-up NL Hold'em is one of the most difficult forms of poker. James Guill gives several tips on how you can improve your heads-up strategy. This is a perfect spot to extract maximum value when you hit your hand. Zunächst zur Begriffsklärung: GTO ist die Abkürzung für Game Theory Optimal – oder auf deutsch: optimal nach Spieltheorie. Die Idee dahinter ist. GTO SENSEI - A REVOLUTIONARY MOBILE APP FOR LEARNING OPTIMAL POKER STRATEGY GTO Sensei will be your personal poker.

Optimal Poker Strategy

Modern Poker Theory: Building an Unbeatable Strategy Based on GTO Principles. +. Play Optimal Poker: Practical Game Theory for Every Poker Player. +. Zunächst zur Begriffsklärung: GTO ist die Abkürzung für Game Theory Optimal – oder auf deutsch: optimal nach Spieltheorie. Die Idee dahinter ist. GTO ist die Abkürzung für Game Theory Optimal, doch warum sollte man vom vermeintlichen Optimum abweichen? Das erklärt FaLLout86 in.

Except for the super-deep stacks who can chip up on the bubble with no risk of busting, the remaining players benefit from any confrontation that leads to elimination.

Thus the two players in the hand are only hurting themselves, by trying to bust each other. And yet, it's not possible for them to collaborate toward a mutually beneficial solution.

Reacting to an opponent's attempts to run you over is so natural to a thinking poker player, framing it in terms of GTO poker can seem almost superfluous.

Of course your opponent has a strategy. You have some idea of what that strategy would be with various hands, and your job is to take that into account when executing your own strategy.

As you adjust your strategy to an opponent's strategy, he or she will adjust to yours, and so forth. For heads-up limit Texas hold'em , the University of Alberta team took this process to its logical conclusion, publishing their results earlier this year in Science magazine.

Using a network of computers, they set two strategies loose, repeatedly adjusting to each others' play. This sounds complicated, and I'm simplifying what they did slightly.

Somewhat confusingly, the University of Alberta team claims both to have "solved" heads up limit hold'em , and also that they found just one GTO equilibrium for heads-up limit hold'em, and that there are likely to be other equilibria for the game, left to be discovered.

This seems to imply that four-betting on the button is wrong, or at least not as profitable as is disguising the hand by flat-calling the three-bet.

Given the rest of their strategy, it would be worse to four-bet with pocket aces. You probably could four-bet with aces, but then the rest of the strategy would need to adjust.

At the very least, you'd need to four-bet other hands, too, so as not to give it away that you had aces. If they fixed as a four-bet and ran the rest of the process until it stabilized, would it reach a different GTO equilibrium?

That would be an interesting experiment. In practice, if you know that your opponent will call off with one-pair hands against pocket aces , and not react as though he knows your very tight four-betting range, then you're just missing a bet.

Game theory uses a strong definition of optimal play, where you're supposed to consider every play you would ever make with any hand as part of the equilibrium.

In a hand discussed on the show, a listener in a limit hold'em game held out of position on an ace-high flop. Heads-up, this is still a plus-EV hand, but there isn't much value in betting.

You're not getting an ace to fold, and by checking, you'll get more value from a bluff, as well as from a value bet with middle pair.

More importantly, the value of check-calling might drop by less than then the value of betting out. Estimating the value of your hand, assuming that both players play well and about even in the long run, is just another way of approximating GTO.

Once you're in three-handed or more games, there is no game theory optimal solution , strictly speaking. This is because there is no stable equilibrium or too many equilibria to count, depending on whom you ask.

The players can always adjust to each other, or take advantage of a player trying to execute a GTO poker strategy and not adjusting to them, through a process that Bill Chen and Jerrod Ankenman call "implicit collusion" in their book The Mathematics of Poker.

When playing heads up, if you or a bot follows a GTO poker strategy, an opponent can't beat you in the long run, no matter what he or she does.

This does not mean that you are winning the most against this opponent, but you are locking in a long-term tie, while still benefitting from some of your opponent's mistakes.

For example, the limit hold'em GTO bot will pay off on the river with bottom pair often enough so you can't bluff it effectively. If you never bluff in this spot, the bot will still pay you off at the same rate.

An exploitative player would stop paying you off after a while, and win even more. Poker pro and poker training site founder Doug Polk spoke on the TwoPlusTwo Pokercast about this situation coming up during a man-vs.

It was such a relief to the players once they realized that while the computer played well "4 out of 10" compared to his regular opponents, according to Polk , it did not attempt to exploit their betting patterns.

If when you flop the nuts you bet 1. It just plays GTO poker. But in practice, if the players don't change their strategies too much from hand to hand and they don't , a lot of the heads-up Game Theory Optional principles apply.

A friend of mine went to graduate school with one of the best online poker players in the world, and had a chance to watch him play. He was surprised that his classmate did not make any unusual plays, or really any "moves" at all.

According to the poker pro :. If you take Chen and Ankenman's ideas about "implicit collusion" to heart, one could also add that if the players were ganging up on him instead of trying to beat each other, the pro would just quit the game.

This is a non-issue in the nosebleed games, since everyone knows everyone else, and playing anonymously or collusively isn't really possible. The point is, the best players in online poker play GTO.

And then they actually do it. There's a lot to be said for good execution. Adjusting this ratio in order to exploit weak players can be even more profitable, but that requires careful and correct adjustments based on reliable evidence.

If you want to move up in stakes and really crush the game long-term, understanding a GTO-influenced strategy is essential.

But the reality is that this process is unreliable against weak players. We can avoid ending up in this sort of situation by using a GTO-influenced bluffing strategy, which keeps us from confusing ourselves and getting into leveling wars on the flop with no equity.

Another benefit of a GTO-based approach to poker is that it forestalls potentially incorrect assumptions of other players.

A well-constructed GTO strategy eliminates confusion, and helps you make the long-term profitable play.

Many players incorrectly judge how they played a hand by its outcome. Yet, thinking objectively can be tough, especially when the result of a hand is either really bad or really good.

Game theory provides a foundation for discerning mistakes more easily. Why is theory important when it comes to making badass adjustments in your strategy?

Suppose you just forgot everything you know about poker strategy, except the rudimentary knowledge of the game, and you are just about to play your first hand ever.

Hero calls. How could you adjust to exploit him in the future? Well, without understanding the theoretically correct way of playing his specific hand, you would not know where to start.

This knowledge makes it easy to deduce ways to exploit this opponent. Striving for a perfect GTO strategy might seem like the logical conclusion, but the truth is nobody plays an entirely game theory optimal strategy.

Poker has yet to be solved by man or machine, but we still highly recommend using game theory to influence your strategy as much as possible.

As always, this means working on your game both on and off the felt. Note: Ready to take your skills to the next level?

Master the secrets behind the success of world-class poker players inside the Upswing Lab. Signup today for free poker strategy, exclusive discounts, and be the first to get notified on new updates.

This is Dynamik Widget Area. Rory Corrigan Poker Strategy Dec 8, About the Author.

Optimal Poker Strategy Optimal Poker Strategy Short-Deck strategy is an extremely new game and the perfect strategy is still being developed. Just like Hold'em in the early s it's going to take some time​. There's some strategy advice too, to help you play the game optimally. Bonus Poker has spawned its own variants, too, and we also cover Bonus Poker Deluxe​.

Optimal Poker Strategy Poker 3-Bet – FAQs Video

Poker Ranges Explained

Of course your opponent has a strategy. You have some idea of what that strategy would be with various hands, and your job is to take that into account when executing your own strategy.

As you adjust your strategy to an opponent's strategy, he or she will adjust to yours, and so forth. For heads-up limit Texas hold'em , the University of Alberta team took this process to its logical conclusion, publishing their results earlier this year in Science magazine.

Using a network of computers, they set two strategies loose, repeatedly adjusting to each others' play.

This sounds complicated, and I'm simplifying what they did slightly. Somewhat confusingly, the University of Alberta team claims both to have "solved" heads up limit hold'em , and also that they found just one GTO equilibrium for heads-up limit hold'em, and that there are likely to be other equilibria for the game, left to be discovered.

This seems to imply that four-betting on the button is wrong, or at least not as profitable as is disguising the hand by flat-calling the three-bet.

Given the rest of their strategy, it would be worse to four-bet with pocket aces. You probably could four-bet with aces, but then the rest of the strategy would need to adjust.

At the very least, you'd need to four-bet other hands, too, so as not to give it away that you had aces. If they fixed as a four-bet and ran the rest of the process until it stabilized, would it reach a different GTO equilibrium?

That would be an interesting experiment. In practice, if you know that your opponent will call off with one-pair hands against pocket aces , and not react as though he knows your very tight four-betting range, then you're just missing a bet.

Game theory uses a strong definition of optimal play, where you're supposed to consider every play you would ever make with any hand as part of the equilibrium.

In a hand discussed on the show, a listener in a limit hold'em game held out of position on an ace-high flop. Heads-up, this is still a plus-EV hand, but there isn't much value in betting.

You're not getting an ace to fold, and by checking, you'll get more value from a bluff, as well as from a value bet with middle pair.

More importantly, the value of check-calling might drop by less than then the value of betting out. Estimating the value of your hand, assuming that both players play well and about even in the long run, is just another way of approximating GTO.

Once you're in three-handed or more games, there is no game theory optimal solution , strictly speaking. This is because there is no stable equilibrium or too many equilibria to count, depending on whom you ask.

The players can always adjust to each other, or take advantage of a player trying to execute a GTO poker strategy and not adjusting to them, through a process that Bill Chen and Jerrod Ankenman call "implicit collusion" in their book The Mathematics of Poker.

When playing heads up, if you or a bot follows a GTO poker strategy, an opponent can't beat you in the long run, no matter what he or she does.

This does not mean that you are winning the most against this opponent, but you are locking in a long-term tie, while still benefitting from some of your opponent's mistakes.

For example, the limit hold'em GTO bot will pay off on the river with bottom pair often enough so you can't bluff it effectively.

If you never bluff in this spot, the bot will still pay you off at the same rate. An exploitative player would stop paying you off after a while, and win even more.

Poker pro and poker training site founder Doug Polk spoke on the TwoPlusTwo Pokercast about this situation coming up during a man-vs.

It was such a relief to the players once they realized that while the computer played well "4 out of 10" compared to his regular opponents, according to Polk , it did not attempt to exploit their betting patterns.

Hi Nathan - avid follower of your work, I have all 4 of your books etc and my winrate has soared. Quick question on set mining with 50BB effective - you state in this article not to do it whereas Jonatha Little's latest book released recently - Fall talks abot set mining with only 40BB effective.

If villain raises to 3BB leaving 37BB effective you are getting just over 12 to 1 if you call - which to my mind is break even given the odds of hitting your set.

Are you saying break even is not enough? I guess that would make sense for the times when you make your set but villain beats you with a better hand at showdown.

Awesome Paul, so glad my books helped you! I think you need closer to 15 to 1 to breakeven with set-mining when taking all things into consideration.

One reason why is because their overpair still has equity by making a higher set or hitting a running flush for instance. I would personally just like to have a little bit more implied odds when set-mining so that there is a clear profit to be made.

Haha sorry Al! Most of your opponents will probably never read this article though :. Hey Mike, This depends a lot on my position at the table.

This is because there are so many more people left to act in the latter scenario who could wake up with a big hand. And it depends on the 50bb player's tendencies as well.

If you want to move up in stakes and really crush the game long-term, understanding a GTO-influenced strategy is essential.

But the reality is that this process is unreliable against weak players. We can avoid ending up in this sort of situation by using a GTO-influenced bluffing strategy, which keeps us from confusing ourselves and getting into leveling wars on the flop with no equity.

Another benefit of a GTO-based approach to poker is that it forestalls potentially incorrect assumptions of other players. A well-constructed GTO strategy eliminates confusion, and helps you make the long-term profitable play.

Many players incorrectly judge how they played a hand by its outcome. Yet, thinking objectively can be tough, especially when the result of a hand is either really bad or really good.

Game theory provides a foundation for discerning mistakes more easily. Why is theory important when it comes to making badass adjustments in your strategy?

Suppose you just forgot everything you know about poker strategy, except the rudimentary knowledge of the game, and you are just about to play your first hand ever.

Hero calls. How could you adjust to exploit him in the future? Well, without understanding the theoretically correct way of playing his specific hand, you would not know where to start.

This knowledge makes it easy to deduce ways to exploit this opponent. Striving for a perfect GTO strategy might seem like the logical conclusion, but the truth is nobody plays an entirely game theory optimal strategy.

Poker has yet to be solved by man or machine, but we still highly recommend using game theory to influence your strategy as much as possible.

Optimal Poker Strategy

Optimal Poker Strategy Table Of Contents Video

We Need To Talk About THE ONE TRUE WAY To Play Poker Diese nennen wir GTO -Strategie. When you have a big stack in a sit and go and you are Aya Chiang Mai getting closer to money paying position you can really exploit the fact that several players are just sitting and waiting for a money paying position. On every street, you sized your bets in a way to be effective, extracting value and creating protection, building the pot, and maintaining a good SPR. Straight Flush 3. Many novice players are simply poker cautious, too much of the time. It can be very helpful to play to the nuts that is the absolute best hand on the board. Top 10 Poker Strategies — Strategies Diario La Costa Suseso help win chances. This can clearly be seen in tournaments, where players often just min-raise to Wie Macht Man Geld Im Internet the pot for all Mlb Wetten mentioned reasons. Like PLO you Grimm Online Anschauen want to be drawing to the nuts. Full House Flush Straight Stargames Bonus Erfahrungen of a Kind. It is interesting to consider what this means to Golden Grin Casino poker player, as well as how this concept has become a dominant framework for looking at ideal poker strategy. Adjusting this ratio in order to exploit weak Skrill Safe can be even more profitable, but that requires careful and correct adjustments based on Casino Konstanz Ab 18 evidence. In this case, you keep the pair. Hero calls. Often times, the correct solution of Quiz Deutschunterricht which hands to play is simply a math problem, which is something discussed below. According Divock Origi Belgium former poker pro Doug Polk, advancements in AI and computing power could lead to bots solving the game of poker in a not too distant future. For a detailed discussion of Deuces Wild strategy, please see our page on Deuces Wild video poker. If you see a bet from a Optimal Poker Strategy player, it could be anything. Going busto as third some more times than if I had chosen a passive approach was no problem since the times I won I took almost the whole pot. Poker Strategy Guide: Back to Basics. Ebenso funktionieren Strategien auch beim Poker. Not all Bonus Poker games are created equal. Die Idee dahinter ist. Kommentar posten. Our Laura Red Online Casino caught up with a number of poker pros to Hot Or Not Game them how frequently they themselves could be said Kerber Radwanska play a "GTO" style. They will improve your level of thinking and increase your profits over time. Optimal Poker Strategy The same cannot be said for flush Ra Re Nolita Online as there are only Erkur Online cards left of your particular suit left in the deck. The best possible version of Bonus Poker Deluxe has a payout percentage of It should be noted that this concept is most commonly used in off-table study and can be difficult to apply in-game. Game theory provides a foundation for discerning mistakes more easily. Am weitesten sind diese bei den Push-Fold-Tabellen — zumeist für Turniere — entwickelt Sicher Geld Anlegen Mit Hoher Rendite auch wenn diese Tabellen selten die beste Strategie gegen spezifische Gegner aufzeigen, bieten diese ein durchaus relevantes Sicherheitsnetz bei Strategien.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.